【#文档大全网# 导语】以下是®文档大全网的小编为您整理的《全球化中英文对照》，欢迎阅读！
Globalization, for good or ill, is here to stay. But what is globalization? Globalization is an attempt to abolish barriers, especially in trade. In fact, globalization has been around longer than you might think.
全球化这个概念,不仅代表了世界各地距离的“收缩”，而且代表了人们不断增强的世界一体化的意识。这是一个用来描述如此社会变化的术语：世界范围的经济活动令跨国贸易、投资、和文化交流大大增加。几个世纪以来，纵然有过中断,涉及到全球化这一概念的各种活动及其发展一直在进行着,但只有在相对较近的一段时期，全球化才成为一个人们讨论的焦点。在当前，或是在刚刚过去的不久，我们所指的全球化时代实际上一直围绕着民族主义、民族国家、民族文化身份这几个概念。我们所面对的新形式的全球化存在于一个相互联系的世界以及全球大众文化里，而这，通常又被我们称为“地球村”。
Globalization, as a concept, refers both to the "shrinking" of the world and the increased consciousness of the world as a whole. It is a term used to describe the changes in societies and the world economy that are the result of dramatically increased cross-border trade, investment, and cultural exchange. The processes and actions to which the concept of globalization now refers have been proceeding, with some interruptions, for many centuries, but only in relatively recent times has globalization become a main focus of discussion. The current or recently-past epoch of globalization has been dominated by the nation-state, national economies, and national cultural identities. The new form of globalization is an interconnected world and global mass culture, often referred to as a "global village."
全球化迷思
对于全球化这一概念，很多学者在争论这是一个真正的现象或者一个神话。虽然这个概念已经广泛流传,但许多学者认为这种现象的特点已经出现在历史上其他的时刻。同时,许多使人们相信我们是在全球化进程中的现象,包括不断增长的国际贸易和扮演越来越重要角色的跨国公司,并不如他们所看起来的那样稳固。对于那些声称全球化已经进入一个必然阶段的观点来说，美国的全球干预政策也是他们论证此一观点的一大障碍。因而, 更多的学者喜欢使用国际化,而非全球化这一术语。实际上,在国际化中，国家所扮演的角色及其重要性会更加突出，而全球化却在完全的消除国家这一形式概念。因此这些学者认为，这些国家在广义上还远远未达到被消解的程度,从而认为，这个激进的全球化进程尚未发生,或者可能不会发生,考虑到世界历史上的国际化从来没有变成了本文所指的全球化程度，而欧盟和北美自由贸易协定的实际表现也并没有为他们所宣扬的全球化提供有力佐证。
Globalization in question
There is much academic discussion about whether globalization is a real phenomenon or only a myth. Although the term is widespread, many authors argue that the characteristics of the phenomenon have already been seen at other moments in history. Also, many note that those features that make people believe we are in the process of globalization, including the increase in international trade and the greater role of multinational corporations, are not as deeply established as they may appear. The United States’ global interventionist policy is also a stumbling point for those that claim globalization has entered a stage of inevitability. Thus, many authors prefer the use of the term internationalization rather than globalization. To put it simply, the role of the state and the importance of nations are greater in internationalization, while globalization in its complete form eliminates nation states. So these authors see that the frontiers of countries, in a broad sense, are far from being dissolved, and therefore this radical
globalization process is not yet happening, and probably won't happen, considering that in world history, internationalization never turned into globalization—the European Union and NAFTA are yet to prove their case.
一些“反全球化”群体认为全球化即是帝国主义,说它是伊拉克战争(2003)爆发的深层原因,它迫使投资流入美国,而不是到发展中国家。
一些人认为全球化强制了信用经济的发展,导致不可持续增长的负债和债务危机。 对全球化持反对意见的保守派阵营实际上是一群国家中心的民族主义者。他们担心全球化会削弱替代国家在全球政治中的角色，而单个国家的力量会被非政府组织阻碍。
Some "anti-globalization" groups argue that globalization is necessarily imperialistic, that it is one of the driving reasons behind the Iraq War (2003), and that it has forced investment to flow into the United States rather than to developing nations.
Some argue that globalization imposes credit-based economics, resulting in unsustainable growth of debt and debt crises.
Another more conservative camp in opposition to globalization are state-centric nationalists that fear globalization is displacing the role of nations in global politics and point to NGOs as impeding the power of individual nations.
As we face these complex problems, we must be able to reach beyond our current policy responses to find new solutions. International trade and technological innovations are essential. So too are livelihoods.
本文来源：https://www.wddqxz.cn/4622a1e8f8c75fbfc77db240.html
2022-03-19
